News
Trump administration celebrates Supreme Court's decision restricting nationwide injunctions, as Bondi noted 35 of 40 ...
To train its AI models, Anthropic stripped the pages out of millions of physical books before immediately tossing them out.
Anthropic scanned and discarded millions of books to train its Claude AI assistant. It also used pirated content. Legal ...
Meta's victory came two days after Claude maker Anthropic won a similar case.
Judges ruled in favor of Meta and Anthropic over fair use in A.I. training, but future cases may hinge on market harm to ...
A federal judge ruled late Monday that Anthropic’s use of books to train its AI model Claude qualifies as “fair use” and is ...
The lawsuit is a win not just for Anthropic, but for all users of large language models.
On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria seemed to do so reluctantly, calling his ...
Meta successfully defended against a copyright infringement lawsuit, as a judge ruled authors didn't prove Meta's AI training ...
AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI only need to pay for cheap sources of copyrighted work to train their models, per a ...
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes ...
Opinion
Hiltzik: An AI firm won a lawsuit for copyright infringement — but may face a huge bill for piracyTwo federal judges in the same courthouse came to different opinions on whether AI firms are breaching copyrights, signaling more legal confusion.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results