The Supreme Court on Thursday revived a lawsuit from an Ohio woman who​ claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination.

Why is the Ames decision potentially so significant It may very well signal the death knell of reverse discrimination as a ...

Ames had sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services in November 2020, alleging that she was wrongfully denied a promotion in favor of a lesbian who was not qualified for the role.

Marlean Ames filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit in 2020 after she lost out on two jobs to colleagues who were gay at the Ohio Youth Department.

This decision is a rebuke to those who have sought to manipulate civil rights protections into a hierarchy of grievance.

The court unanimously sided with an Ohio woman who claimed she was discriminated against at work because she is straight.

The woman in the case, Marlean Ames, is a heterosexual woman who had worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services since 2004. She argued she was discriminated against on the basis of her ...

There’s a lot of history in the Mid-Ohio Valley with Parkersburg on the West Virginia side of the Ohio River being chartered ...

In the end, the justices seemed to agree on almost everything—what Justice Neil Gorsuch called “radical agreement”—about the ...

In the decision, the court held that federal civil rights statutes give members of majority groups the same right to sue as ...