News
The court agreed with TikTok that this is a First Amendment issue — rejecting government claims that, among other things, TikTok’s foreign ownership should strip it of speech protections.
A US appeals court upheld a law that could result in TikTok being banned in the United States. The court denied TikTok’s argument that the law was unconstitutional and the judges found that the law ...
Denying TikTok’s argument that the law was unconstitutional, the judges found that the law does not “contravene the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,” nor does it ...
"It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States." Related ...
So the D.C. Circuit just held in TikTok v. Garland, written by Judge Douglas Ginsburg, and joined by Judge Neomi Rao. Some key excerpts from the panel majority: To summarize our First Amendment ...
It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.
Both President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump (during his first term in office) supported policies seeking to divorce TikTok from ByteDance, at least within the United States ...
TikTok, HamHom, and the First Amendment Eugene Volokh | 1.15.2025 10:11 AM I was having a conversation with my Stanford colleague Diego Zambrano, and this perspective on the TikTok case emerged.
Many will read last week’s federal appeals-court opinion that could ban TikTok as a loss for the First Amendment, and in some ways it is.If TikTok disappears from the United States, some 170 ...
To Ban TikTok, Supreme Court Would Rank “National Security” Before First Amendment . Critics worry that a sweeping ban based on predictions rather than more concrete proof of TikTok’s ...
Hosted on MSN7mon
TikTok is one step closer to being banned in the US - MSNDenying TikTok’s argument that the law was unconstitutional, the judges found that the law does not “contravene the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,” nor does it ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results